Coursera 笔记

Module 06 · Looking Back, Looking Forward回顾与展望

Peer Review: Final Assignment同伴互评:期末作业

Assignment Six: Choose one of the ten topics previously assigned that you have not written about. Your options are below.
第六项作业:从之前分配的十个主题中选择一个你尚未撰写的主题。选项如下。

Assignment One: What are Social Goods? What is the Commons? 作业一:什么是社会公共物品?什么是公共领域?

  1. Find a commons in your neighborhood or region. Describe how people use this community resource, and how they have developed rules or norms to prevent it from being depleted. Make a contribution to this commons and describe its impact.
    在你的社区或地区找到一个公地。描述人们如何使用这个社区资源,以及他们如何制定规则或规范来防止其被耗尽。为这个公地做出贡献,并描述其影响。

  2. Describe at least two examples of how individuals or private corporations have tried to take something to which a community had free access and restrict this access on the basis of private ownership or price. What can you do to bring something back into the commons?
    描述至少两个个人或私营企业试图将社区可以自由获取的东西限制为基于私有产权或价格而获取的例子。你能做些什么来将某物重新纳入公地?

Assignment Two: Poverty and Prosperity 作业二:贫困与繁荣

  1. Imagine that you have been put in charge of allocating a considerable amount of resources to address extreme poverty in one region of the world. Describe the three most important questions you would want to ask to determine how to use these materials most effectively.
    假设你负责将大量资源分配给世界上某个地区的极端贫困问题。描述你会提出的三个最重要的问题,以确定如何最有效地使用这些物资。

  2. Describe the persistence of poverty in your neighborhood or region. What is the most important thing you can do to alleviate the suffering caused by poverty? Find at least one other person with whom you can take an action that makes a positive difference. Describe what you’ve done and why it matters.
    描述你所在社区或地区的贫困持续存在的情况。你能做最重要的事情来缓解贫困造成的苦难是什么?找到至少一个人,与这个人一起采取行动,产生积极影响。描述你所做的事情以及为什么它很重要。

Assignment Three: Climate Change and Sustainability 第三次作业:气候变化与可持续发展

  1. Find ways to assess and then reduce your carbon footprint. You can, for example, sign up with Joulebug.com or Handprinter.org to do this. Recruit at least three other people to sign up. Report on your results.
    寻找评估并减少自身碳足迹的方法。例如,您可以注册 Joulebug.com 或 Handprinter.org 来完成此操作。招募至少三人注册。报告您的结果。

  2. Many have reported on the difficulty of getting people to focus on climate change because it’s such a long-term problem. Describe two techniques you have found useful in getting people to either change the pattern of their own energy consumption or to advocate for public policies that address environmental threats.
    许多人报告说,由于气候变化是一个长期问题,因此让人们关注气候变化的难度很大。描述您发现的两种在改变人们自身能源消耗模式或倡导解决环境威胁的公共政策方面有用的技术。

Assignment Four: Global Disease and Health 第四次作业:全球疾病与健康

  1. Jim Kim, president of the World Bank Group, ascribed much of the success of the fight against HIV/AIDs to a political movement that pushed powerful groups to deal with this health crisis. Describe at least two other examples in which political or social mobilization has had an important impact on fighting disease. How can you become a part of such a movement today?
    世界银行集团总裁吉姆·金将抗击艾滋病/HIV 的成功很大程度上归因于一场推动强大群体应对这一健康危机的政治运动。请描述至少两个其他政治或社会动员对防治疾病产生重要影响的例子。你如何才能成为今天这样一场运动的参与者?

  2. “Studies suggest that a third of the disease burden among children is due to environmental factors we can change.” What can you do to make others more aware of the changes that are already within reach? Describe at least two ways in which you can raise awareness of our ability to lower mortality rates among children. Try one of these actions and report.
    “研究表明,儿童疾病负担的三分之一是由于我们可以改变的环境因素。”你可以做些什么来使其他人更加意识到已经可以实现的变化?请描述至少两种提高人们对降低儿童死亡率能力认识的方式。尝试其中一种行动并报告。

Women, Education and Social Change 女性、教育与社会的变革

  1. Describe at least two examples from different parts of the world in which building capacity for women and girls has turned out to be an effective strategy of enhancing health and well-being for a society more generally.
    请描述至少两个来自世界不同地区的例子,说明为妇女和女孩提升能力已成为增强社会整体健康和福祉的有效策略。

  2. Find at least one other person with whom you can work to work within a community to reveal the capacities of women or girls in that community. Report on that work.
    找到至少一个人,与你一起在社区内工作,揭示该社区妇女或女孩的潜力。报告你的工作。

评分标准概述

Your essay will be graded for relevance and completeness of argument, accurate use of references to the readings and lectures in support of your argument, and the clarity and organization of your writing. Keep in mind the overarching questions of the course: What do we know? Why do we care? What can we do? Be thoughtful and thorough in your response to the essay topic; construct an argument that carefully leads the reader through your ideas; and attempt to synthesize and build upon the ideas discussed in the lectures and readings. And, importantly, demonstrate steps you can take to make a positive difference in the world.
你的论文将根据论证的相关性和完整性、对阅读材料和讲座内容的准确引用以支持你的论证、以及写作的清晰度和组织性进行评分。请记住课程的总体问题:我们了解什么?我们为什么关心?我们能做什么?在回应论文主题时,要深思熟虑、全面;构建一个仔细引导读者理解你想法的论证;并尝试综合和扩展讲座和阅读中讨论的观点。重要的是,展示你可以采取的步骤来为世界带来积极影响。


作答构思

请帮我再写一篇。我选择主题4。我的论点是,中国从新中国成立以来一直自认为发展中国家而非发达国家。但却和资本主义集大成者美国形成了一个很好的对比。最近互联网上引起大范围讨论的一个概念是美国的“斩杀线”,即37%的美国人拿不出400美元来应急,(甚至从刚成年的学业贷款、商业保险就开始让人无法有足够存款),于是一旦发生意外大额开支,无法租房、无法找到工作、成为流浪汉,就从此没有办法重新回到正常生活,直至卷入一些更黑暗的境地后死亡。与之相对,中国社会有一个很重要的概念叫做“锁血线”,一旦人因为意外陷入贫困,社区会主动联系你培训你一些实用技能,去摆摊或者打工,而工厂也提供包吃包住的工作,现在的外卖、快递等灵活就业也让人足够活下来翻身。实在不行,还能投靠家人或朋友。

请帮我翻译成英文。并且修改最后一段升华我的思想结论:我认为美国的社会机制像癌、而中国的是可持续生命。

Social Resilience in a Developing Nation: A Perspective from the "Execution Threshold" to the "Health-Lock Mechanism"

While China still identifies as a developing nation, standing at a different stage of development from the highly developed capitalist United States, the two countries present a stark contrast in the underlying logic of their social safety nets. This comparison reveals a central issue: the key measure of societal development may not be the absolute level of total wealth, but whether its institutions provide a "safety net" to prevent the most vulnerable from falling. Analyzing the American "execution threshold" dilemma and China's "health-lock mechanism" offers a deeper understanding of how social resilience is constructed.

In the United States, despite its highly developed economy, its social welfare system exhibits significant fragility. A 2019 Federal Reserve report noted that approximately 37% of American adults could not come up with $400 for an emergency expense. This creates what is termed the "execution threshold"—a financial cliff formed by high student loans, expensive private insurance, precarious employment, and limited social assistance. Once an individual crosses this line due to an unexpected expense (like a medical bill or car repair), it can trigger a chain reaction: inability to pay rent leads to loss of housing, which in turn hampers job searches, potentially culminating in homelessness. Recovery from this state is extremely difficult, making individuals highly susceptible to deeper health and social problems, forming a poverty trap that is hard to escape. This exposes the inherent weaknesses of a social protection model centered on extreme marketization and individualism when confronting risks.

In contrast, Chinese society has developed a unique "health-lock mechanism" during its development. Its core lies not in providing high welfare benefits, but in creating a "survival base" and a "recovery" pathway for individuals in distress through diversified social networks and flexible livelihood opportunities. Firstly, grassroots organizations and community networks​ serve as crucial safety valves. Community workers proactively contact struggling families to provide information and assist in accessing temporary aid or public-service jobs. Secondly, the informal economy and flexible employment​ provide immediate income sources. Low-barrier-entry sectors like street vending, food delivery, and courier services allow individuals to quickly earn a basic living. Many manufacturing and service jobs that provide "meals and accommodation" directly address fundamental survival needs. Finally, strong family and kinship ties​ offer a last, yet vital, layer of informal security. This mechanism is not a perfect welfare state system, but a hybrid model based on social connections, labor market flexibility, and pragmatic intervention, designed to prevent individuals from completely "bleeding out" after a shock, preserving the possibility of returning to normal life.

From this comparison, what can we do? The insight is profound: the fundamental structures of societal health can be antithetical. One system may inadvertently function like a cancer, where individual vulnerability is not just a flaw but a perverse driver of profit and control within a fragmented, marketized safety net. The other, however imperfect, strives to operate as a sustainable living organism, where resilience is built through layered redundancy—familial, communal, and economic—aiming for repair and reintegration rather than expulsion. The task, then, is to advocate for and build institutions that mimic the logic of life: adaptive, interconnected, and prioritizing the restoration of wholeness. We must support policies that strengthen community bonds, create flexible livelihood options, and offer genuine "second chances." True social development is measured not by the height of its "ceiling" but by the strength of its "floor"—its capacity to transform potential "execution thresholds" into resilient "health-lock" systems that sustain the very fabric of communal life.

References

  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2019). Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households.
  • The description of China's "health-lock mechanism" synthesizes various academic and policy discussions on grassroots governance, flexible employment, and social networks in China.